9. Any other information regarding a library patron supplied to or gathered
by the library
shall be given, made available or disclosed to any individual, corporation,
institution, government agency or agency without a valid process, order or
subpoena. Upon presentation of such a process, order or subpoena, the library
shall resist its enforcement until such time as a proper showing of good cause
has been made in a court of competent jurisdiction. Patron registration and
circulation records are exempt from the Kansas Open Records Law (K.S.A.
45-221 (23)).
All library employees (and those volunteers who work in its behalf) are
hereby instructed to comply with these guidelines. The Board of Directors
recognizes that it is only through continued public confidence in the fact that
these guidelines are indeed being upheld that the public can maintain its
confidence in the library. It is this confidence that is vital to the library's
role in the community and the community's right to know.
[For suggestions on procedure, see
Template for Law Enforcement Inquiries Guideline, New York
Library Association, Intellectual Freedom Committee.]
Suggested Procedures for Implementation of a Policy on
Confidentiality of Library Records
When drafting local policies, libraries should consult with their legal
counsel to ensure these policies are based upon and consistent with applicable
federal, state, and local law concerning the confidentiality of library records,
the disclosure of public records, and the protection of individual privacy. (See
Interpretations to the Library Bill of Rights, including
Access to Electronic Information, Services, and Networks and
Privacy.)
Suggested procedures include the following1:
1. The library staff member receiving the request to examine or obtain
information relating to circulation or other records identifying the names of
library users must immediately refer the person making the request to the
responsible officer of the institution, who shall explain the confidentiality
policy.
2. The director, upon receipt of such process, order, or subpoena, shall
consult with the appropriate legal officer assigned to the institution to
determine if such process, order, or subpoena is in good form and if there is a
showing of good cause for its issuance.
3. If the process, order, or subpoena is not in proper form or if good cause
has not been shown, the library should insist that such defects be cured before
any records are released.
4. The legal process requiring the production of circulation or other library
records is ordinarily in the form of a subpoena duces tecum (bring your records)
requiring the responsible library officer to attend court or to provide
testimony at his or her deposition. It also may require him or her to bring
along certain designated circulation or other specified records.
5. Staff should be trained and required to report any threats or unauthorized
demands (e.g., those not supported by a process, order, or subpoena) concerning
circulation and other records to the appropriate officer of the institution.
6. Any problems relating to the privacy of circulation and other records
identifying the names of library users that are not provided for above shall be
referred to the responsible officer.
1See also
Confidentiality and Coping with Law Enforcement Inquiries: Guidelines for the
Library and its Staff
Last revised: November 2, 2005